Investigate stage:

Research on the Brief:

The brief states that forests are increasingly threatened by climate change, biodiversity loss, wildfires, droughts, high temperatures and diseases. It also states that forests are one of the most important ecosystems on Earth.

Due to the recent prevalence of wildfires (Australia 2020 and Los Angeles 2025 being the most notable), the immense damage that they cause (financial, economic and personal) and the cyclical nature of the issue (Climate change causes wildfires, wildfires emit CO₂, CO₂ aggravates climate change etc.),

I have decided to make wildfires the theme of my project.

Wildfires in Ireland:

Wildfires, despite Ireland having a mild and moist climate, are a common occurrence in Ireland. For example, in 2025 31 fires burned 4355 hectares of land (7 times the area of Pheonix Park). ^[1]

Furthermore, Wildfires have a significant cost to the Irish economy and taxpayer. According to Maynooth University, a wildfire can cost between €1500 and €2500 per ha to suppress and replant ^[2]. Using these figures, 2024's wildfires could have cost between €6.5m and €11m.

Existing Solutions:

Sensor Networks:

Currently sensor networks are limited in the size of their implementation. The largest scale system I could find is the Silvanet Wildfire Sensor manufactured by Dryad Networks GmbH based in Germany.

This sensor uses a Bosch BME688 which measures Air Temperature, Air Moisture, Air Pressure and Air Quality. However, the BME688 does not measure the levels of gases precisely, it only measures change in gas resistance and estimates a CO₂ level.

The sensor utilizes a solar panel for power, supercapacitors instead of batteries for storage of electricity to reduce fire risk and LoRaWan to transmit data.
While LoRaWan does offer low power consumption, its performance can be poor in dense environments such as forests. It also requires additional proprietary hardware to connect to the Internet

A single sensor costs €48, lasts 10-15 years and has a radius of 100m (for detection of a fire within 1 hour), therefore costing approximately €16 euro per hectare (ha) of detection.

Infrared Cameras:

Infrared cameras are becoming increasingly prevalent as a method of detecting wildfires.

They are deployed either as a camera tower at a high point, or on satellites.
Infrared cameras have the benefit of high range, however, they only spot wildfires after the smoke have risen above the forest’s canopy. This means that there could be a few hours between a fire starting, and the fire producing enough smoke to be detected.

One example of land based infrared detection is Pano AI, a California based company with cameras deployed across 10 US states, 5 Australian states and British Columbia, Canada. Since 2020, they have detected over 100,000 fires with their cameras, and according to Pano AI, their detection has helped lower response time by 20-30 minutes in some cases. The company has received 89 Million USD in venture capital and was named in the top 100 most influential companies of 2025 by Time magazine.

Currently satellites are used as a method to monitor fires once they have started and to track the fire’s border. This is because the current systems: MODIS and VIIRS have resolutions of 1km and 375m respectively.
They also have a low update frequency of around 6 times a day, and slow processing time; with data taking 2-3 hours to be processed before being available to fire agencies.

However, in 2025 a non-profit called Earth Fire Alliance in partnership with Google launched FireSat, a new fire sensing satellite cluster which was named as one of Time magazine’s best inventions of 2025.
The Firesat satellite cluster can detect fires at a resolution of 5x5 metres and updates every 20 minutes. This system has been successful so far, with 9 agencies across 3 continents using its data. Earth Fire Alliance plans to build a constellation of 50 satellites by 2030.
The satellites' high resolution and fast updates have the potential to vastly improve the contribution of satellites in fighting wildfires.

Watchtowers:

Watchtowers have historically been used for detection; however, they are being replaced by other systems.

In the US for example, at one point there were 8000 manned fire lookouts across the country ^[3], now it is estimated that there are only 300 manned lookouts remaining. ^[4]

Drones:

Drones have also recently been introduced as a method to prevent and control wildfires.
Several manufacturers offer drones used for prescribed burns, monitoring fires and extinguishing fires.

For example, DJI, a leading drone manufacturer currently sells drones for detecting wildfires.

An example of a DJI firefighting drone (via. dji.com):

Drone Amplified is a company which sells the IGNIS II, a drone used for Prescribed burns.
Prescribed burns were previously done either by firefighters on the ground, which can be a risk to firefighters, or aerially, which involved dropping incendiary bombs via. plane or helicopter.
Drones can make aerial burns without need to risk firefighters' lives, or expensive aircrafts.
According to Drone Amplified, their drone costs 15,000 USD, while a helicopter can cost between 5-10,000 USD a day.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, a holistic approach including sensors, infrared cameras, satellites, drones and detailed fire risk analysis and prevention, is probably best.

For this project I will design and build an embedded system, intended to be deployed as part of a wildfire detection network similar to the Dryad Networks solution.